World Islamic Call Society

I will confine myself here to discuss the dialectics of nature Engel, two chapters of his book, which contains nine articles, which has evolved 80% of the content in and around science, through which the dialectic of the two objects living and non-living were discussed and tried to apply the principles of science in the mix of scientific and philosophical way to convince readers of all sectors worldwide

1) Introduction

2) Dialectic

3) basic form of motion

4) Measure the labor movement

5) heat

6) Electricity

7) Kant tidal friction and stretch-Thomson in the rotation of the Earth and the lunar attraction

The role of work in the transition from ape to man

9) natural science and the spiritual world.

 

. Of course I was able to ignore basic human humanities, which most other sciences of their time out of their increase, for reasons unknown. This book could not be seen in the world without Karl Marx without which Engel identification can not be considered separately, as said many times

.

In my previous writings, because Frederick Engel deviate from the concept of Karl Marx, the dialectic of nature? In describing the true story of the doctors in a remote

Villa was only to say that the subject has experienced only a right of action in modern times where ordinary people want to know more of the comments related only. Engle was actually a student of science and its strong association with scientists

It was no secret and open to all who were familiar with their contributions to help Karl Marx at that time.

 

In reality, the dialectics of nature, a series of articles was incomplete, the lifetime of both Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. Much later, was conducted in German in English in 1925. Karl Marx had some small difference in fundamental prepositions “foreign” elements of these articles for the support of the application as Engel had in mind at that time

 

. In fact, I was thinking about writing a book about science and its performance relative to other contemporaries as an equal, but unfortunately it was not possible for a couple of unique in the world that has greatly contributed to the poor as a light in the hands to live with dignity and respect.

 

I do not because all the acts of the individuals themselves are not as similar as possible in all repeated action, if asked to repeat the same conditions and in the same situation without changing the objects linked to the practical idea of how behavior and the social sciences or in other words, if someone knocks on the validity of adding the word “science” for the humanities, are different from each of its secondary branches, main branches beyond its divisions of topics, namely, physical sciences, life sciences and the humanities, not moving further into its branches and sub-branches in depth. For answers to simple questions that follow what I like to say that all the answers very important bifurcate the issues in the dialectics of nature into two main branches for the living and nonliving first

.

1) A person can hit all six in 12 balls, at least?

2) You can do any good spinner entire team continuously in two or three years?

3) Can a man sign the card in the same way without any difference?

4) Why not take the injured to hospital in an accident of the ground?

5) Why did not reach all prisoners in all the cases registered by police in all states?

 

6) Why not vote for a candidate to all citizens in all democratic countries in the world?

7) Why do Warren Buffet and Bill Gates have contributed all their assets in the past?

What was the need to Osama bin Laden to leave their rich life and why to participate in war games with the powerful forces of the United States and its allies

9) Why did Saddam Hussein, with his uncompromising stance against U.S. forces and was killed, along with thousands of thousands of people on both sides?

10) Why 1. 5 million Cambodians lost their lives in war.

 

Answering all these questions, the mind must be used only for humans but not non-living things in nature. Why are some contradictions in human society. The first of these was the man and nature. Nature has its own contradictions, with all its elements that play a key role in shaping that any new development. In nature, the players are important, fire, water, forests, soil, temperature and rain falls

 

. On the other hand, wild animals, poisonous insects, animals and friendly way elsewhere. Humans and their descendants of origin, development, have another party. Each party and its branches including its components and the players never play elsewhere as a flexible set of merging all its rules. In essence, where players from that particular field has its own set of laws and principles for the various acts to play within your circle. When players are different rules and laws also differ from the previous field.

 

So the principles of physics and chemistry is not a single set of laws. At the same time, biology, astronomy and mathematics not a single set of law because his players are different and their rules are different from another branch of law. The unique set of planetary laws, human beings have the dominant role in shaping the nature to change conditions such as global warming and climate change

 

. The effects and influences of human acts is the consolidation of men throgh or through the mechanism of changing conditions on the planet. To change the laws of any branch that has the role of internal actors know if the software programming language specific to a particular job is enforceable and enforced. No other software is allowed to carry out work in other Windows-only

 

The smooth flow of goods are developed by one or two people with his knowledge of the issues and found that these soft wares are useful for making money in the global market through your company or just for themselves.

 

In addition, computers were invented and developed for the convenience of the works of the people. “Therefore, who invented and developed all soft products useful for the world market, as well as for themselves.. Here’s another question , Charles Babbage, who was the idea behind the invention of computers and the same idea was materialized through just Eckert and Mauchly. Now most people are using computers in the world. It seems that the world teams are doing all the work and humans are the next and were guided by computer

 

. From a distant look on man-computer, which is common to understand that human beings are dependent on computers and computers are the driving force for humans. And those who are writing the history of contemporary society in the future, so I really could write what they saw from the outside. As in the case of Engels’s writings on the dialectics of nature. By means of the invention and write something new in today’s society is common to write the past, corresponding to the visible elements to their logical conclusions, but only think and write

.

The fundamental and important question in the name of Marxism, dialectics of nature, if Marxism, in which the whole structure is raised by other contributors to the development of Marxism, Lenin, and after Moa. But all these contributions are not formed only in the name of Marxism, but all these “isms” were up in philosophization same structure in a form, including all persons and their collaborators.

The following is the set of laws, Engel took the writings of Hegel, and described his performance in his book.

“Y” then the history of nature and human society that the laws of dialectics are distracted. Because they are only the most general laws, these two aspects of historical development as well as thought itself, and in fact can reduce the top three.

1) The law of transformation

2) The interpretation of the law

3) The law of negation of negation ”

These laws basically extracts from the writings of Hegel and the way it was applied to the dialectics of nature has been described in detail. Here I reference in the description of the laws of man with comparison of other physical and biological entities and add the other topic clearly relevant to separate the human laws of the laws of things that do not occur in nature. At the same time, nobody should have any objection to the description of the laws of all science and where the laws of human beings and human nature are discussed, it is the duty of everyone to change over human beings List laws in all the sciences “Maximum Interest humans are seriously damaged by the belief that human laws are very scientific and based on science that will save human society for peace and prosperity in the law of universal brotherhood with all aspects of the rights guaranteed by the Charter humans. Here are the following statements on the issues between them to prepare a universal set of laws common to both non-human humans in the name of dialectics of nature

.

“But they have raised for the first time in its universal validity of a general law of development of nature, society and thought, will always remain a place of historical importance. And these men have done for years the quantity and quality to become the “one another, not knowing what they did and then have to be content with Moliere’s M. Jourdain, who had spoken prose all his life without some form of Inking”

It is clear that Engel has stated that these laws are general laws of development of nature, society and thought and played in his statements already made by all the sciences with the names of the makers of their knowledge.

 

In his article, “the basic form of movement” has taken in principle Helmhotlz Descartes law of conservation of force, the right of Kant and Kant’s theory of cosmology-Lap-lace in passing its laws to men with its laws of science

.

It could be understood that the dialectic is demonstrated by the results of our experience of nature, so far all the opposite pole are generally determined by the interaction of the two polar opposites to each other, the separation and opposition these poles exists only with your unit and connect the other and vice versa, the interconnection exists only in his separation and unity in the opposition. ” This shows that the two opposites of the mutual connection and unity in their opposition speaks directly to the company and people everywhere in the communist world. This type of direct application to the society by the communist parties around the world in a very mechanics of the basic historical mistakes what I understand about the dialectical nature Engel should be adjusted and applied to human philosophy based on Marxism, although things based on Marxist philosophy nonliving physical, biological, chemistry, philosophy, mathematics, astronomy and non-living things driven by the dialectics of nature Engel.